You'll note that in none of my reviews of iPad models that have switched from Lightning to USB-C in recent years have I complained about the switch. But I didn't complain about them not switching, either. If the iPhones 13 had switched to USB-C, I wouldn't have complained. To be clear, I'm neither pro-Lightning nor pro-USB-C. I'm not accusing Gartenberg of this - though it is his piece with the sub-head claiming there's "a" singular reason - but many iPhones-should-definitely-use-USB-C proponents argue as though there are no good reasons for the iPhone to continue using Lightning. The pro-USB-C crowd, to me, often comes across as ideological. There are numerous reasons that the iPhones 13 still use Lightning - and there are numerous reasons why switching to USB-C would make sense. Putting that in the singular does not do justice to the complexity of such decisions. The sub-head on Gartenberg's piece is "The iPhone doesn't have USB-C for a reason". "What makes sense for the goals of this product that we will ship in three years? And then the subsequent models for the years after that?" Those are the questions Apple product designers ask. My theory is that Apple carefully weighs the pros and cons for each port on each device it makes, and chooses the technologies for those ports that it thinks makes for the best product for the most people.
#Lightning connector iphone pro#
How many normal people do you know who ever buy anything that plugs into a Lightning port other than a USB cable? And Apple doesn't make more money selling their own (admittedly overpriced) Lightning cables to iPhone owners than they do selling their own (also overpriced) USB-C cables to iPad Pro and MacBook owners.
It's loose-change-under-the-couch-cushion revenue by Apple's astonishingly high standards. But I don't think there's serious money in that. And they're glad to have control over all iPhone peripherals. Apple is happy to keep the money it earns from MFi, of course. And Apple takes a cut of every one of those devices, too." Gartenberg summarizes a commonly-held theory here: that Apple is sticking with its proprietary Lightning port on iPhones because they profit from MFi peripherals. Apple's MFi program means that if you want to plug anything into an iPhone, be it charger or adapter or accessory, you have to go through Apple. It also means that Apple would lose out on the revenue it makes from every Lightning cable and accessory that works with the iPhone, Apple-made or not - along with the control it has over what kinds of hardware does (or doesn't) get to exist for the iPhone and which companies get to make them. An anonymous reader shares a report from Daring Fireball, written by John Gruber: Chaim Gartenberg, writing for The Verge, " The Lightning Port Isn't About Convenience It's About Control": "Notably absent from Apple's argument, though, is the fact that cutting out a Lightning port on an iPhone wouldn't just create more e-waste (if you buy Apple's logic) or inconvenience its customers.
0 kommentar(er)
